VOlUME 05 ISSUE 08 AUGUST 2022
1Panagiota Xanthopoulou,2Krystallo Lappa
1,2Hellenic Open University, Parodos Aristotelous 18, Patras, Greece, 26335
DOI : https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v5-i8-61Google Scholar Download Pdf
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this research is to investigate the factors that contribute to the quality of the communication process between tutors-counsellors and students in the departments of an Open University where group advisory meetings are organised through video conferencing. Communication in open distance education is multidimensional and since the most important form of communication is the interpersonal relationships, it is interesting to explore how the quality of communication is ensured when face-to-face meetings are replaced by teleconferencing in view of the current pandemic crisis. The research process that was followed is identified as descriptive-diagnostic, adopting a mixed research approach, through the collection, analysis and synthesis of quantitative and qualitative methods. Findings showed that adult students consider that the quality in communication requires the tutor to encourage participation, involvement in the process of learning and developing critical thinking. However, the respondents believe that through video conference there is not a high frequency of interaction. Therefore, it is important to investigate the effectiveness of other factors in the learning process in addition to the technological ones.
KEYWORDS:Distance education, communication quality, interaction, tele-conferencing, tutor - counsellor
REFERENCES
1) Abad-Segura, E., González-Zamar, M. D., Infante-Moro, J. C., & Ruipérez García, G. (2020). Sustainable management of digital transformation in higher education: Global research trends. Sustainability, 12(5), 2107.
2) Anyanti, J., Akuiyibo, S., Idogho, O., Ohuneni, S., & Isiguzo, C. (2020). Assessment of Factors Contributing to TB Treatment Adherence among Patients on TB Treatment in Kano State, Nigeria: A Case Study. Journal of Tuberculosis Research, 8(04), 209.
3) Armakolas, S., Panagiotakopoulos, C. T., & Karatrantou, A. V. (2021). Teleconference Sessions in Distance Learning Courses: The Influence of Psychological Factors. International Journal of Online Pedagogy and Course Design (IJOPCD), 11(2), 1-15.
4) Bates, A. T. (2005). Technology, e-learning and distance education. Routledge.
5) Behera, A., Matthew, P., Keidel, A., Vangorp, P., Fang, H., & Canning, S. (2020). Associating facial expressions and upper-body gestures with learning tasks for enhancing intelligent tutoring systems. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 30(2), 236-270.
6) Bergdahl, N., Nouri, J., Fors, U., & Knutsson, O. (2020). Engagement, disengagement and performance when learning with technologies in upper secondary school. Computers & Education, 149, 103783.
7) Bordoloi, R., Das, P., & Das, K. (2021). Perception towards online/blended learning at the time of Covid-19 pandemic: an academic analytics in the Indian context. Asian Association of Open Universities Journal.
8) Bower, M., Sturman, D., & Alvarez, V. (2016). Perceived utility and feasibility of wearable technologies in higher education. Mobile Learning Futures–Sustaining Quality Research and Practice in Mobile Learning, 49.
9) Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101.
10) Brocato, B. R., Bonanno, A., & Ulbig, S. (2015). Student perceptions and instructional evaluations: A multivariate analysis of online and face-to-face classroom settings. Education and Information Technologies, 20(1), 37-55.
11) Bryman, A. (2017). Quantitative and qualitative research: further reflections on their integration. In Mixing methods: Qualitative and quantitative research (pp. 57-78). Routledge.
12) Burgoon, J., Arneson, E., Elliott, J. W., & Valdes-Vasquez, R. (2021). Visual ethnographic evaluation of construction programs at public universities: Who is valued in construction education?. Journal of Management in Engineering, 37(4), 04021025.
13) CARMO, R. D. O. S., & FRANCO, A. P. (2019). From face-to-face teaching to online teaching: the learning of university teachers in distance education. Educação em Revista, 35.
14) Clark, C., Strudler, N., & Grove, K. (2015). Comparing asynchronous and synchronous video vs. text based discussions in an online teacher education course. Online Learning, 19(3), 48-69.
15) Creswell, J. W. (2011). Controversies in mixed methods research. The Sage handbook of qualitative research, 4(1), 269-284.
16) Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2003). A theory of critical inquiry in online distance education. Handbook of distance education, 1(4), 113-127.
17) Holbeck, R., & Hartman, J. (2018). Efficient strategies for maximizing online student satisfaction: Applying technologies to increase cognitive presence, social Presence, and teaching Presence. Journal of Educators Online, 15(3), n3.
18) Jeong, H. (2019). Rethinking Open Universities: what makes them unique?. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(4), 152-166.
19) Katz, A., & Kedem-Yemini, S. (2021). From classrooms to Zoom rooms: Preserving effective communication in distance education. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research, 23(3), 173-212.
20) Lenkaitis, C. A. (2020). Technology as a mediating tool: videoconferencing, L2 learning, and learner autonomy. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 33(5-6), 483-509.
21) Leppisaari, I., & Vainio, L. (2015). Digital leap of teachers: two Finnish examples of rethinking teacher professional development for the digital age. ascilite2015, 168.
22) Llompart, J. (2021). Students as teachers, teacher as learner: Collaborative plurilingual teaching and learning in interaction. In Plurilingual Classroom Practices and Participation (pp. 54-65). Routledge.
23) Liu, Z. Y., Lomovtseva, N., & Korobeynikova, E. (2020). Online learning platforms: Reconstructing modern higher education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(13), 4-21.
24) Martin, F., Wang, C., Jokiaho, A., May, B., & Grübmeyer, S. (2019). Examining Faculty Readiness to Teach Online: A Comparison of US and German Educators. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning, 22(1), 53-69.
25) Mayer, G., Lingle, J., & Usselman, M. (2017). Experiences of Advanced High School Students in Synchronous Online Recitations. Educational Technology & Society, 20(2), pp. 15–26. Retrieved 30 November, 2020, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1137511.pdf
26) Moore, M. G. (1989). Three types of interaction.
27) Murphy, L., Eduljee, N. B., & Croteau, K. (2020). College Student Transition to Synchronous Virtual Classes during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Northeastern United States. Pedagogical Research, 5(4), pp. 1-10. https://doi.org/10.29333/pr/8485
28) Papadimitriou, S., Lionarakis, A., & Ioakeimidou, V. (2019). The Hellenic Open University: Innovations and Challenges in Greek Higher Education. Ανοικτή Εκπαίδευση: το περιοδικό για την Ανοικτή και εξ Αποστάσεως Εκπαίδευση και την Εκπαιδευτική Τεχνολογία, 15(1), pp. 6-22. doi:https://doi.org/10.12681/jode.20211
29) Rasi, P., & Vuojärvi, H. (2018). Toward personal and emotional connectivity in mobile higher education through asynchronous formative audio feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49(2), pp. 292–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12587
30) Richards, G. (2015). A Guide to Virtual Universities for Policy-Makers. Canada: Commonwealth of Learning. Retrieved 30 November, 2020, from http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.
31) Salazar-Márquez, R. (2017). Digital Immigrants in Distance Education. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 18(6), pp. 231-242. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v18i6.2967
32) Shoepe, T., McManus, J., August, S., Mattos, N., Vollucci, T. & Sparks P. (2020). Instructor Prompts and Student Engagement in Synchronous Online Nutrition Classes. American Journal of Distance Education, 34(3), pp. 194-210. DOI: 10.1080/08923647.2020.1726166
33) Smith, V., & Wortley, A., (2017). “Everyone’s a comedian.” No really, they are: using humor in the online and traditional classroom. Journal of Instructional Research, 6, pp. 18-23. Retrieved 30 November, 2020, from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1153377.pdf
34) Stavrakakis, E., & Xanthopoulou, P. (2019). Supporting Students as a Means of Preventing Dropout in Open and Distance Education. International Journal of Sciences, 8, pp. 9 - 19. Retrieved November 30, 2020, from https://www.ijsciences.com/pub/article/2171
35) Sims, R. and Stork, E. . Design for contextual learning: Web‐based environments that engage diverse learners. Proceedings of AusWeb07, Thirteenth Australasian World Wide Web Conference. Edited by: Richardson, J. and Ellis, A. Lismore, , Australia: Southern Cross University. Retrieved November 1, 2007, from http://ausweb.scu.edu.au/aw07/papers/refereed/sims/index.html [Google Scholar]
36) Sing-Kiat Ting, R., Jian-Ai Thong, J., Lim, J. Y. R., & Jones, E. (2022). Assessing the Efficacy of Contextualized Group Counseling Education in Asia: A Mixed Methods Study. International Journal for the Advancement of Counselling, 1-19.
37) Vlachopoulos, D., & Makri, A. (2019). Online communication and interaction in distance higher education: A framework study of good practice. International Review of Education, 65(4), 605-632.
38) Willems, J. (2015). Digital equity: A social justice issue for staff, not just students. In T. Reiners, B.R. von Konsky, D. Gibson, V. Chang, L. Irving, & K. Clarke (Eds.), Globally connected, digitally enabled, 30 November - 3 December 2015: Conference proceedings, (pp. 604-607). Perth, Australia: ascilite. Retrieved November 30, 2020, from https://espace.library.uq.edu.au/data/UQ_386259/UQ386259_OA.pdf
39) Wrench, J. S., Peck Richmond, V., & Gorham, J. (2009). Communication, affect, & learning in the classroom.
40) Xanthopoulou, P. (2020). Theoretical Approach and Analysis of Stakeholders’ Impact on Quality Processes in Higher Education - The Case of Greek Universities. International journal of sciences, 9(2), pp. 34-45. DOI: 10.18483/ijSci.2269
41) Xanthopoulou, P., & Kappou, I. (2021). “The impact of communication between tutors-counselors and university students in Open and Distance Education on the autonomous and effective learning”, International Journal of Engineering, Management and Humanities, 2(1), pp.66-80. Retrieved March 3, 2021 from https://www.ijemh.com